Airway interventions during intravenous anesthesia in children undergoing direct laryngoscopy for surgical procedures using high flow versus low flow nasal oxygen. Flowkid

Keywords:

Pediatric anesthesia, general anesthesia, oxygen inhalational therapy, airway management, airway surgery, supraglottoplasty, laryngomalacia


Published online: Mar 06 2026

https://doi.org/10.56126/76.S.03

Devriendt E.1,2, Saldien V.1,2, Aerts S.1, Maes S.1

1 Department of anesthesiology, University Hospital of Antwerp (UZA), Drie Eikenstraat 655, 2650 Antwerp, Belgium
2 University of Antwerp (UA), Universiteitsplein 1, 2610 Wilrijk, Belgium

Abstract

Background: Direct laryngoscopy in pediatric patients presents anesthetic challenges, particularly in maintaining airway patency and oxygenation. High-flow nasal oxygen therapy (Optiflow™) has been proposed as an alternative to conventional low-flow oxygen, potentially improving mucosal hydration and respiratory stability.

Objectives: This study compared airway responses and anesthetic interventions when using high-flow and low- flow oxygen in children undergoing direct laryngoscopy for supraglottoplasty. The impact of humidified, heated air on postoperative mucosal quality and surgical conditions was also assessed.

Design and setting: A prospective randomized controlled study conducted in the operating rooms of Antwerp University Hospital.

Materials and methods: The primary endpoint was a composite endpoint, namely airway responses and/or interventions (ARIN) and consisted of the incidence of airway responses, including desaturation (SpO2 < 90% for >30 sec), bradycardia/tachycardia (≥30% change from baseline), and need for airway interventions (mask ventilation, nasopharyngeal airway, or intubation). Secondary endpoints included postoperative mucosal quality and surgeon satisfaction.

Results: ARIN occurred in 74% of patients, with no significant difference between groups (p=0.628). The number of ARIN per patient was higher in the low flow group (n=33 vs n=10), although not statistically significant (p=0.621). Sub analysis showed a slightly higher number of patients with desaturation in the low flow oxygen group (n=2 vs n=3), though total desaturation events were higher in the low-flow group (n=8 vs. n=2). Apnea occurred in 5 (55.6%) high-flow and 7 (70%) low-flow patients. Intubation was required in two (20%) low-flow patients but none in the high-flow group (p=0.167). Postprocedural mucosal quality was significantly better in high-flow patients (p<0.001). Surgeon satisfaction was slightly higher in the high-flow group (p=0.496).

Conclusion: While high-flow oxygen did not significantly reduce airway interventions, it improved mucosal hydration. Further studies with larger samples are needed to confirm these findings.